Super Bowl XLIV: Where was all the excitement?
February 9, 2010 at 12:24 am 9 comments

Drew Brees and his son (Image credit to tvbythenumbers.com). My favorite picture from the entire night.
Last night’s Super Bowl was overall- how shall I say it- a little lackluster in every way possible.
I thought the game would be an epic match-up between two teams that dominated their divisions all through the regular and post seasons. The half-time performance was from a band that’s legendary, with four decades of music under their belts. And the advertising? That’s always the best part of Super Bowl Sunday, especially for advertising nerds like myself.
I’m one of those rare girls who actually sits down on Sundays and watches football all day- doesn’t matter what team is playing. If it’s football, I watch it. End. of. story. After last year’s Cardinals/Steelers match up (YAWN- I remember the NFC Championship being more exciting than the Super Bowl last year), I couldn’t WAIT to see these two great teams play each other. I was surprised to see a game that didn’t get me as excited as some regular season games, though. Very few penalties, one sneak onside kick, ONE challenge, and one interception later and the Saints won the Super Bowl.
As for half-time, I’m sorry. I did not like The Who’s performance. If I wanted to hear all the songs from CSI, I would watch the show. I think we should start a petition for Lady Gaga as Super Bowl Half Time performer 2011.
Lastly, the advertising. Where are the days where the Super Bowl was the industry’s showcase of new and innovative talent and creativity? The last few years have shown the opposite. Save very few advertisements from this year (to see all the ads from this year’s Super Bowl, click here, curtsey of AdAdge.com). I loved the Google ad about studying in Paris. The Snickers commercial with Betty White was hysterical. I also loved the CareerBuilder.com commercial about casual Fridays and could only imagine how that would go down in my office. The VW commercial was good too, though I’m a little biased- a friend from college works on the VW account. And of course, the Doritos commercial with the little kid was awesome. And where was all the social media? I only remember the E*TRADE commercials mentioning any kind of social media efforts, which were only their pages on YouTube and Facebook.
But that’s it? Those are the only ones I found interesting? Maybe my standards are a little higher now that I studied advertising and graduated already.
Who knows? I was also surprised at the lack of diversity in companies that advertised. Two words: the economy. The current economic status is not ideal for multi-million dollar 30-second television advertising spots. We all know that’s why only few companies advertised last night. However, my boss suggested that the reason why the ads were generally lacking was the fact that since the spots were so expensive, they couldn’t afford the creative talent to create the ad. If that’s the case, why spend so much money on the ad in the first place?
What is your take on this year’s Super Bowl- all aspects of the night? How creative do you think the advertising was? Are the days of creative showcase in the Super Bowl over? What can advertisers do to reinstate the superior quality of ads during the Super Bowl? Anyone else see other social media for other companies other than E*TRADE?
Entry filed under: Advertising, social media. Tags: Advertising, Creative, Excitement, facebook, Indianapolis Colts, New Orleans Saints, social media, Super Bowl XLIV, The Who, twitter, Youtube.
Cee Cee Designs
Google
LinkedIn
Tweets
1. Tweets that mention Super Bowl XLIV: Where was all the excitement? « CCM | Christa C. Marzan -- Topsy.com | February 9, 2010 at 3:19 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ross Simmonds and Christa Marzan, Christa Marzan. Christa Marzan said: [New post] Super Bowl XLIV: Where was all the excitement?: http://wp.me/pHY7w-3L [...]
2. uberVU - social comments | February 9, 2010 at 4:30 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by ChristaMarzan: [New post] Super Bowl XLIV: Where was all the excitement?: http://wp.me/pHY7w-3L…
3.
Ross Simmonds | February 10, 2010 at 1:10 am
When it came to the actual game I too was a bit unimpressed that IS until the last quarter. The first half I was more interested in the Advertising then the actual game which shocked even me because I’m a football pheen. Anyways, the last quarter definitely had me on the edge of my seat as I prayed that the colts would come back but…as we all know, that didn’t happen.
I spent the halftime show on Hootsuite trying to track brandbowl and reading the complaints about the Dodge Ad. It was much better than the Who. I’m scared to think that Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson may have ruined the halftime show forever. Why can’t they bring in Black Eyed Peas or someone who isn’t older than the Superbowl itself?
4.
christamarzan | February 10, 2010 at 2:20 am
I agree with you Ross- though I was happy that the Saints won haha. The game didn’t get good until the 4th quarter. I thought it was going to be so neck-in-neck that whoever had the ball last would win by a field goal. Boy was I surprised…
I was doing that during half time also. Brand bowl DEFINITELY distracted me during the game haha. JT/Janet might have ruined it for everyone, because I can’t remember anyone under the age of 50 performing in half time since then? Age doesn’t even matter though. Last year Bruce rocked half time. I think Bon Jovi would be awesome also. Just someone with more energy and, like you said, someone who isn’t older than the game itself.
Thanks for the great comment!
5.
Bill Prange | February 10, 2010 at 4:00 am
I agree with you regarding both the game and the ads. It was weird. Usually after watching a football game I feel like I can analyze why it played out how it did. After the Super Bowl, nothing really stood out to me other than the onside kick, of course, and the interception to seal the game. I remember when the Saints took the lead 24-17, I commented that Peyton Manning was probably going to make a game-tying drive to give fans the first overtime Super Bowl game ever. Then he threw a pick and it was over.
I typically don’t care much for any halftime shows, regardless of who’s performing. They just seem so dry and forced. It’s awkward. There really isn’t a crowd the way there would be in a typical concert, so it has an odd feel to it. They do have to move to younger acts eventually though. Don’t they?
As for the ads, I had the same kind of feeling as I did about the game. After the game there were very few that I remembered, either good or bad. I really liked the Google spot. I know some didn’t like the Dodge ad, but I liked it because they at least took a different approach to a car ad than we usually see. Doritos and Snickers had some funny moments. I remembered lots of animals. Other than that, nothing really stuck. I wonder why that is?
It might just be a result of the the way people react to advertising these days. I think customers are more savvy and aware of how they’re being marketed, and a lot of the old ways to reach them through TV are not as affective anymore. This could explain why Pepsi decided to go the social media route instead of Super Bowl advertising. Maybe advertisers aren’t sure how to create really affective TV ads right now.
It will be interesting to see how the Super Bowl plays out a year from now. By then social media will have really caught on, and I would expect to see a lot more of that reflected in the advertising.
6.
christamarzan | February 10, 2010 at 4:18 am
Yea, the game was pretty much decided by that onside kick- which almost didn’t work! I’m glad it did. Even if Manning didn’t throw the pick, I think the Saints would have won still. It might have been a more interesting game to watch if he didn’t throw a pick, though. Not really sure…
I agree with you about ads not sticking out. I honestly have no idea why, but I think it’s a shame to shell out so much money for an ad that doesn’t stick and is white noise. It’s a shame, really. Pepsi was so smart not to advertise. Brilliant plan in my opinion.
I agree with you about consumer’s thinking now, though. That could very well be a possibility why advertisements, especially tv ads, aren’t as effective anymore. Social media is the way to go- again, I’ll say that Pepsi is very wise in using their money in that instead of television. I would have thought there would be more call-to-actions for social media in the advertising we saw, but didn’t and was let down by that. Hopefully that’ll change soon.
Thanks for commenting and sharing your thoughts, Bill!
7.
Benjamin McCall | February 10, 2010 at 5:06 pm
Just like any game changer that interception in the final quarter changed everything!
I only watch them for the commercials :)
Twitter: @BenjaminMcCall
Website: http://ReThinkHR.org
& LinkedIn
8.
christamarzan | February 10, 2010 at 7:29 pm
I agree! I wish there were more game changers though!
Thanks for commenting!
9.
Social Media “Call to Action” In Advertising- Where Is It? « CCM | Christa C. Marzan | April 19, 2010 at 9:06 am
[...] to actions’ in advertising?” This is a question I’ve been asking ever since the Super Bowl and the questionable advertising we saw there. Four months later, I’m still wondering the [...]